Galager

(PC) McGee v. Galager

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 19, 20241:21-cv-00837California683 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

BACKGROUND

24 On June 18, 2024, the undersigned issued a screening order on Plaintiff’s Second 25 Amended Complaint, directing Plaintiff to either (1) file a notice to proceed on the claims found 26 cognizable in the Court’s screening order and voluntarily dismiss the remaining claims and 27 defendants, or (2) file a notice to stand on the SAC subject to the undersigned recommending 28 dismissal of certain claims and defendants, as set forth in the Court’s screening order. (Doc. No. 29 at 7). On July 10, 2024 the mail containing the Order was returned “Undeliverable, RTS, Attempted-Not Known, Unable to Forward.” See docket. Plaintiff’s change of address was due no later than September 11, 2024. Local Rule 183(b). Plaintiff has not filed an updated address as required by Local Rule 182(f) and the time to do so has expired. See docket. APPLICABLE LAW AND ANALYSIS Plaintiff was obligated to keep this Court informed of his proper address. Specifically: [a] party appearing in propria persona shall keep the Court and opposing parties advised as to his or her current address. If mail directed to a plaintiff…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.