(PC) Kalso v. Butte County Jail

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 19, 20242:24-cv-00754California1,725 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ZACHARY LLOYD KALSO, No. 2:24-cv-0754 WBS SCR P Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS BUTTE COUNTY JAIL, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, a former county inmate proceeding pro se, filed this civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. §1983. Before the court is plaintiff’s complaint for screening and plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”). For the reasons set forth below, the court grants plaintiff’s motion to proceed IFP and recommends the complaint be dismissed without leave to amend. IN FORMA PAUPERIS When he filed this action, plaintiff submitted a declaration that makes the showing required by 28 U.S.C. §1915(a) to proceed IFP. However, on March 28, 2024, plaintiff filed a change of address in another case in this court showing that he is no longer incarcerated. See Kalso v. Butte County Superior Court, 2:24-cv-0653-JDP (E.D. Cal., ECF No. 8). Typically in this…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.