Warden
(HC) Leavy v. Warden
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CARNELL A. LEAVY, Case No. 1:22-cv-00915-KES-HBK (HC) Petitioner,
ORDER GRANTING PETITIONER’S
v. CONSTRUED MOTION FOR REVIEW OF
PETITION TO THE LIMITED EXTENT SET
WARDEN, FORTH HEREIN Respondent. (Doc. No. 18) 16 Before the Court is Petitioner’s “motion to grant habeas corpus relief.” (Doc. No. 18). Petitioner Carnell A. Leavy, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has pending a petition for writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. (Doc. No. 1, “Petition”). The Supreme Court has instructed federal courts to liberally construe the “inartful pleading[s]” of pro se litigants. See Boag v. MacDougall, 454 U.S. 364, 365 (1982). Thus, the Court construes Petitioner’s request as a motion for a ruling on his Petition. The Court has the discretion to manage its own docket. Ferdik v. Bonzelet, 963 F.2d 1258, 1261 (9th Cir. 1992). And while the Court endeavors to handle all matters as…