Warden

(HC) Leavy v. Warden

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 19, 20241:22-cv-00915California345 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CARNELL A. LEAVY, Case No. 1:22-cv-00915-KES-HBK (HC) Petitioner,

ORDER GRANTING PETITIONER’S

v. CONSTRUED MOTION FOR REVIEW OF

PETITION TO THE LIMITED EXTENT SET

WARDEN, FORTH HEREIN Respondent. (Doc. No. 18) 16 Before the Court is Petitioner’s “motion to grant habeas corpus relief.” (Doc. No. 18). Petitioner Carnell A. Leavy, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has pending a petition for writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. (Doc. No. 1, “Petition”). The Supreme Court has instructed federal courts to liberally construe the “inartful pleading[s]” of pro se litigants. See Boag v. MacDougall, 454 U.S. 364, 365 (1982). Thus, the Court construes Petitioner’s request as a motion for a ruling on his Petition. The Court has the discretion to manage its own docket. Ferdik v. Bonzelet, 963 F.2d 1258, 1261 (9th Cir. 1992). And while the Court endeavors to handle all matters as…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.