(SS) Smith v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 19, 20241:23-cv-00660California3,662 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 PIROSKA SMITH, Case No. 1:23-cv-00660-BAM Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

v. FOR LEAVE TO FILE A SUPPLEMENTAL

PLEADING

14 MARTIN O’MALLEY, Commissioner of Social Security, (Doc. 18) Defendant. ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFF’S

MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

17 (Docs. 10, 16) 18 19 INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Piroska Smith (“Plaintiff”) seeks judicial review of a final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security (“Commissioner”) denying her application for supplemental security income under Title XVI of the Social Security Act. The matter is currently before the Court on (1) Plaintiff’s motion for leave to file a supplemental pleading; and (2) Plaintiff’s motion for summary 25 26 27 Martin O’Malley became the Commissioner of Social Security on December 20, 2023. Pursuant to Rule 25(d) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Martin O’Malley is substituted as the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.