(PC) Calloway v. Naphcare Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 19, 20242:24-cv-02446California829 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JAMISI JERMAINE CALLOWAY, No. 2:24-cv-2446 CKD P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND NAPHCARE INCORPORATED, et al., FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a California prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil action. This proceeding was referred to this court by Local Rule 302 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Plaintiff has requested leave to proceed in forma pauperis. Title 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) reads as follows: In no event shall a prisoner bring a civil action . . . [in forma pauperis] if the prisoner has, on 3 or more prior occasions, while incarcerated or detained in any facility, brought an action or appeal in a court of the United States that was dismissed on the grounds that it is frivolous, malicious, or fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, unless the prisoner is under imminent danger of serious physical injury. On October 15, 2020, in…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.