Smith v. Kemper Insurance
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 CANDACE SMITH, Case No. 1:24-cv-00587-SKO Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THE
ACTION SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED
v. FOR PLAINTIFF’S FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THE COURT'S ORDER KEMPER INSURANCE, STEVE
D’AMBROSIO, ALL-STATE
INSURANCE, CESAR RODRIGUEZ, (Doc. 4) Defendants.
13 14 I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Candace Smith, proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed a complaint on May 16, 2024. (Doc. 1). On July 30, 2024, the undersigned screened the complaint (Doc. 4) and ordered Plaintiff to take one of three actions within 30 days: (1) file a First Amended Complaint; (2) notify the Court in writing that she wishes to stand on this complaint; or (3) file a notice of voluntary dismissal. Although more than 30 days have passed, Plaintiff has not taken further action in this case. The Local Rules, corresponding with Fed. R. Civ. P. 11, provide, “[f]ailure of counsel or of a party to comply…