Ikegbu

(PC) Cortinas v. Ikegbu

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 17, 20242:23-cv-00285California322 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 LARRY WILLIAM CORTINAS, No. 2:23-cv-00285-TLN-CKD Plaintiff, v. ORDER N. IKEGBU, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On July 18, 2024, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on all parties, and contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. (ECF No. 55.) The time to file objections has passed, and neither party filed objections to the findings and recommendations. The Court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.