Phillips

(PC) Schmaus v. Phillips

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 19, 20241:23-cv-01125California702 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JASON ERIK SCHMAUS, No. 1:23-cv-01125-JLT-SAB (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER VACATING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

v.

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

PHILLIPS, et al. RECOMMENDING DISMISSAL OF

CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEFENDANTS

Defendants. (ECF Nos. 21, 29, 30) 16 Plaintiff is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. I. DISCUSSION Plaintiff filed the instant action on July 21, 2023. On August 9, 2023, the Court screened Plaintiff’s initial complaint, found no cognizable claims, and granted Plaintiff thirty days to file an amended complaint. (ECF No. 9.) After receiving Plaintiff multiple extensions of time, Plaintiff eventually filed a first amended complaint on January 22, 2024. (ECF No. 19.) On March 18, 2024, the Court screened Plaintiff’s first amended complaint, found he stated a cognizable claim for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.