Embry

B&G Foods North America, Inc. v. Embry

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 20, 20242:20-cv-00526California4,695 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 B&G FOODS NORTH AMERICA, INC., No. 2:20-cv-00526-KJM-SCR Plaintiff, v. ORDER KIM EMBRY, et al., Defendants. 16 Before the court are three discovery motions: 1) Defendants’ Motion to Strike (ECF No. 181); 2) Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel a Rule 30(b)(6) deponent (ECF No. 183); and 3) Plaintiff’s renewed Motion to Compel a Rule 30(b)(6) deponent (ECF No. 202). As the two motions to compel are duplicative, ECF No. 183 will be denied as moot as it has been superseded by ECF No. 202. The parties submitted Joint Statements (ECF Nos. 206 & 208) setting forth their positions as to the Motion to Strike (ECF No. 181) and Motion to Compel (ECF No. 202). The Court heard argument for approximately 90 minutes on September 12, 2024. The Court now grants the Motion to Strike and grants in part, and denies in part, the Motion to Compel. Introduction Plaintiff brought this action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 alleging…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.