Campos

Campos v. O'Neal

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 20, 20242:24-cv-01317California2,262 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 Julio Camps and Miriam Campos, No. 2:24-cev-01317-KJM-SCR Plaintiffs, ORDER Vv. Dyck O’Neal, Inc., et al., 1S Defendants. 16 Plaintiffs Julio Campos and Miriam Campos apply ex parte for a temporary restraining 18 order barring a foreclosure sale of real property in Turlock, California. See generally Third Ex Parte App. TRO, ECF No. 36. For the reasons below, and as specified in more detail in the 20 conclusion of this order, (1) the ex parte application is granted, (2) the parties are referred to a mandatory settlement conference before the assigned Magistrate Judge, and (3) and a 22 hearing on a motion for a preliminary injunction is set for October 10, 2024. 23 I. BACKGROUND In a previous order, the court summarized plaintiffs’ claims and allegations, which are 25 incorporated here by reference, as they have largely remained unchanged. See First TRO, ECF No. 10. In short, Mr.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.