Zepp
(PC) Mosley v. Zepp
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 20, 20241:23-cv-00421California682 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10 11 THETHESIUS HOSEA MOSLEY, Case No. 1:23-cv-00421-JLT-EPG (PC) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF PRO BONO v. COUNSEL
ZEPP,
ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINE FOR
PLAINTIFF’S TO RESPOND TO
Defendant
DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY
JUDGMENT
ORDER FOR DEFENDANT TO FILE A
RESPONSE REGARDING PLAINTIFF’S
ALLEGATIONS OF LACK OF LEGAL
PROPERTY
19 (ECF No. 51) 20 21 Plaintiff Thethesius Mosley is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action 22 filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleging deliberate indifference to Plaintiff’s serious medical 23 needs. 24 On September 19, 2024, Plaintiff filed a motion for appointment of pro bono counsel. (ECF No. 51). As grounds, he states that he cannot afford counsel, his case is complex, and his incarceration is limiting his ability to litigate this case, particularly, in responding to Defendant’s motion for summary…