Zepp

(PC) Mosley v. Zepp

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 20, 20241:23-cv-00421California682 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10 11 THETHESIUS HOSEA MOSLEY, Case No. 1:23-cv-00421-JLT-EPG (PC) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF PRO BONO v. COUNSEL

ZEPP,

ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINE FOR

PLAINTIFF’S TO RESPOND TO

Defendant

DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY

JUDGMENT

ORDER FOR DEFENDANT TO FILE A

RESPONSE REGARDING PLAINTIFF’S

ALLEGATIONS OF LACK OF LEGAL

PROPERTY

19 (ECF No. 51) 20 21 Plaintiff Thethesius Mosley is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action 22 filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleging deliberate indifference to Plaintiff’s serious medical 23 needs. 24 On September 19, 2024, Plaintiff filed a motion for appointment of pro bono counsel. (ECF No. 51). As grounds, he states that he cannot afford counsel, his case is complex, and his incarceration is limiting his ability to litigate this case, particularly, in responding to Defendant’s motion for summary…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.