Insixiengmay

Insixiengmay v. Hyatt Corp.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 23, 20242:18-cv-02993California1,149 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10 JANICE INSIXIENGMAY, individually and ) Case No. 2:18-cv-02993-TLN-DB 11 on behalf of all other similarly situated ) employees, ) CLASS ACTION ) Plaintiff, ) ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION ) FOR ATTORNEY’S FEES AND COSTS, vs. ) REPRESENTATIVE ENHANCEMENT, AND ) SETTLEMENT ADMINISTRATOR COSTS

HYATT CORPORATION DBA HYATT )

REGENCY SACRAMENTO, a Delaware ) Corporation; and DOES 1 to 100, inclusive, ) ) Defendants. ) ) 19 ) ) ) ) ) 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 TO ALL PARTIES AND THEIR RESPECTIVE COUNSEL OF RECORD: Pursuant to the Court’s March 12, 2024, Order Granting Plaintiff’s Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class Action and PAGA Settlement (Doc. No. 77), Plaintiff’s Motion for Attorney’s Fees and Costs, Representative Enhancement, and Settlement Administrator Costs (“Motion”) in the above referenced case came on for hearing…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.