Depree

Depree v. Jungwirth

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 23, 20242:22-cv-01462California3,626 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 SCOTT DEPREE, No. 2:22-cv-01462-TLN-DMC

Plaintiff

v. ORDER

JERRY JUNGWIRTH II, et al.,

Defendants 16 This matter is before the Court on Defendants Jerry A. Jungwirth II (“Jungwirth”), Richard Knox (“Knox”), Eric Patterson (“Patterson”),1 and County of Tehama’s (“County”) (collectively, “Defendants”) Motion to Dismiss. (ECF No. 18.) Plaintiff Scott Depree (“Plaintiff”) filed an opposition. (ECF No. 22.) Defendants filed a reply. (ECF No. 23.) For the reasons set forth below, the Court hereby GRANTS Defendants’ motion. /// 23 Although Patterson is listed as a Defendant in the First Amended Complaint (“FAC”), the Court previously dismissed Plaintiff’s claims against Patterson without leave to amend, and Plaintiff confirms Patterson is no longer a Defendant in this action. (ECF No. 22 at 8.) 25 Therefore, the Court will not address arguments as to Patterson.

26 Plaintiff also sues…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.