Grajeda

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ROBERT CAVAZOS, No. 2:24-CV-0457-DMC-P Plaintiff, v. ORDER E. GRAJEDA, et al., and Defendants. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 16 Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Pending before the Court is the motion to dismiss filed by Defendants McKean, Trevino, Aldredge1, Damacion, Grajeda, Becerra, and Gardner. See ECF No. 14. Plaintiff has filed an opposition. See ECF No. 17. Defendants have filed a reply. See ECF No. 18. In considering a motion to dismiss, the Court must accept all allegations of material fact in the complaint as true. See Erickson v. Pardus, 551 U.S. 89, 93-94 (2007). The Court must also construe the alleged facts in the light most favorable to the plaintiff. See Scheuer v. Rhodes, 416 U.S. 232, 236 (1974); see also Hosp. Bldg. Co. v. Rex Hosp. Trustees, 425 U.S. 738, 740 (1976); Barnett v. Centoni, 31…