Tabor

(PC) Dao v. Tabor

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 23, 20242:22-cv-00846California390 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CUONG HUY DAO, No. 2:22-cv-00846-TLN-CSK Plaintiff, v. ORDER P. TABOR, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On May 17, 2024, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on all parties, and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. (ECF No. 93.) Plaintiff filed objections to the findings and recommendations. (ECF No. 94.) The Court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.