Lund

Lund v. Datzman

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 23, 20242:19-cv-02287California10,745 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ERIC LUND, No. 2:19-cv-02287-TLN-DMC Plaintiff, v. ORDER JEFFREY DATZMAN, et al., Defendants. 16 This matter is before the Court on three separate Motions to Dismiss: (1) Defendants State of California, Samuel Dickson, Steve West, Kevin Knopf, John Blencowe, Warren Stanley, Joseph Farrow, Nick Norton, Helena Williams, Kevin Domby, David Varao, and Ryan Duplissey’s (collectively, “State Defendants”) Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 114); (2) Defendants City of Vacaville, Jeffrey Datzman, Steven Carey, Mark Ferreira, and Chris Lechuga’s (collectively, “City Defendants”) Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 117); and (3) Defendants County of Solano, Krishna Abrams, and Ilana Shapiro’s (collectively, “County Defendants”) Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 118). Each motion has been fully briefed. For the reasons set forth below, the Court GRANTS in part and DENIES in part State Defendants’ motion, GRANTS in part and DENIES in part City…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.