Newsom

(PC) Kelly v. Newsom

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 25, 20242:23-cv-02581California334 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JAMES CARL KELLY, No. 2:23-cv-02581-TLN-DMC-P Plaintiff, v. ORDER GAVIN NEWSOM, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff James Carl Kelly (“Plaintiff”), a prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On July 2, 2024, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on the parties, and which contained notice that the parties may file objections within the time specified therein. (ECF No. 11.) Plaintiff filed a timely objection on August 16, 2024. (ECF No. 12.) The Court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983). …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.