(HC) Hatchett v. Clark

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 24, 20242:24-cv-01627California2,115 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CECIL JEROME HATCHETT, No. 2:24-cv-1627 AC P Petitioner, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

KEN CLARK, Respondent. 16 Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se on a petitions for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. I. Procedural History After filing the original petition (ECF No. 1), and before the court could complete screening, petitioner proceeded to file two amended petitions (ECF Nos. 7, 10). Because it was not clear from any of the petitions what conviction or sentence petitioner sought to attack or what grounds for relief he sought to assert, petitioner was directed to file a third amended petition (ECF No. 13), which he has now done (ECF No. 15). II. Third Amended Petition The third amended petition initially indicates that it is a challenge to petitioner’s 1992 parole revocation and subsequent prison term out of Sacramento County. ECF No. 15 at 1. 28 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.