(HC) Barton v. Superior Court of San Joaquin County

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 25, 20242:23-cv-02176California906 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 WILLIAM BARTON,

Petitioner, No. 2:23-cv-02176-TLN-CKD v. SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN JOAQUIN ORDER

COUNTY,

Respondent. 17 18 This matter is before the Court on pro se Petitioner William Barton’s (“Petitioner”) Motion for Relief from an Order. (ECF No. 10.) Respondent Superior Court of San Joaquin County (“Respondent”) has not appeared in the matter and did not file an opposition. For the reasons set forth below, the Court DENIES Petitioner’s motion. /// /// /// /// 27 As discussed below, the Court construes Petitioner’s untimely objections as a motion for relief from an order. Petitioner is a state prisoner challenging the legality of his incarceration. On October 2, 2023, Petitioner filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus (“Petition”) but failed to pay the required filing fee. (ECF No. 1.) On November 1, 2023, the magistrate judge notified Petitioner that the Petition would be denied unless, within thirty (30) days,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.