(PC) Cragg v. Garland

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 24, 20241:24-cv-01124California461 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10 11 EDWARD PAUL CRAGG, Case No. 1:24-cv-01124-EPG (PC) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION TO

PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS AND

v. ORDER DIRECTING PAYMENT OF

INMATE FILING FEE BY TAFT

GARLAND et al., COMMUNITY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY Defendants. 17 Plaintiff is a federal pretrial detainee proceeding pro se pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and Bivens v. Six Unknown Federal Narcotics Agents, 403 U.S. 388 (1971) and has requested leave to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. Plaintiff has made the showing required by § 1915(a) and accordingly, the request to proceed in forma pauperis will be granted. Plaintiff is obligated to pay the statutory filing fee of $350.00 for this action. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1). Plaintiff is obligated to make monthly payments in the amount of twenty percent (20%) of the preceding month’s income credited to Plaintiff’s trust account. Taft Community Correctional Facility is required to send to the Clerk of the Court payments from…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.