Ghazaryan

Ghazaryan v. County of Madera

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 24, 20241:24-cv-00436California4,888 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

I. INTRODUCTION

15 Plaintiffs Hovsep Ghazaryan and Alina Mkrtchyan (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) bring this action against Defendants County of Madera (the “County”) and Matthew Treber (collectively, “Defendants”) alleging a cause of action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 for denial of procedural due process under the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution. (Doc. 1.) On July 12, 2024, Defendants filed a motion for summary judgment. (Doc. 18.) With leave of Court (Doc. 29), Plaintiffs filed their opposition on September 9, 2024 (Doc. 30), and Defendants replied on September 18, 2024 (Doc. 31). The matter was deemed suitable for decision without oral argument pursuant to Local Rule 230(g), and the Court took the matter under submission without a hearing. (Doc. 29.) For the reasons set forth below, Defendants’ motion for summary judgment will be granted.1 26 27 28 1 A. The Solar Project Permit On November 30, 2021, the County’s Community and Economic Development Building and Fire Safety Department (“Department”) received a building permit application from Plaintiffs for the construction of a Ground Mount…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.