Martinez

(HC) Kopp v. Martinez

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 25, 20242:22-cv-00280California714 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9

JASON CHARLES KOPP, No. 2:22-cv-0280-TLN-JDP Petitioner, v. ORDER

MARTINEZ,

Respondent.

17 This matter is before the Court on pro se Petitioner Jason Charles Kopp’s (“Petitioner”) 18 Motion for Relief from Judgment. (ECF No. 28.) Respondent Martinez (“Respondent”) did not 19 file an opposition. For the reasons set forth below, the Court DENIES Petitioner’s motion. 20 /// 21 /// 22 /// 23 /// 24 /// 25 /// 26 27 As discussed below, the Court construes Petitioner’s objections as a motion for relief from judgment. A detailed recitation of the factual and procedural history is not necessary for the disposition of Petitioner’s motion. As relevant here, Petitioner is a state prisoner challenging his criminal conviction via a writ of habeas corpus (the “Petition”). On November 30, 2022, the magistrate judge made findings and recommended the Court grant Respondent’s motion to dismiss the Petition as…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.