Sergent

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CHRISTIAN D. GATES, No. 2:22-cv-1576 DAD CSK P Plaintiff, v. ORDER S. SERGENT, et al., Defendants. 16 On August 27, 2024, defendants filed a motion for summary judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56. (ECF No. 44.) Plaintiff did not oppose the motion. Local Rule 230(l) provides in part: “Failure of the responding party to file written opposition or to file a statement of no opposition may be deemed a waiver of any opposition to the granting of the motion . . . .” Local Rule 230(l). On April 20, 2023 (ECF No. 32) and August 27, 2024 (ECF No. 44-7), plaintiff was advised of the requirements for filing an opposition to a motion and that failure to oppose such a motion may be deemed a waiver of opposition to the motion. See Woods v. Carey, 684 F.3d 934 (9th Cir. 2012); Rand v. Rowland, 154 F.3d 952, 957 (9th Cir. 1998) (en banc). Local Rule 110 provides that failure to comply with the Local…