(SS) Schmidt v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 25, 20241:23-cv-01240California4,909 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 VERONICA JANENE SCHMIDT, Case No. 1:23-cv-01240-HBK Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, DENYING

v. DEFENDANT’S CROSS-MOTION FOR

SUMMARY JUDGMENT, AND

MARTIN O’MALLEY, REMANDING CASE TO COMMISSIONER

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL OF SOCIAL SECURITY

SECURITY,1 (Doc. Nos. 13, 15) Defendant. 17 18 Veronica Janene Schmidt (“Plaintiff”) seeks judicial review of a final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security (“Commissioner” or “Defendant”) denying her application for disability insurance benefits under the Social Security Act. (Doc. No. 1). The matter is currently before the Court on the parties’ briefs, which were submitted without oral argument. (Doc. Nos. 13, 15). For the reasons set forth more fully below, the Court grants Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment, denies Defendant’s cross motion for summary judgment, and remands the

1 The Court has…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.