(SS) Rashid v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 26, 20242:23-cv-01826California5,947 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MARCO RASHID, Case No. 2:23-cv-1826-CSK Plaintiff, ORDER ON PARTIES’ CROSS MOTIONS

FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

v. (ECF Nos. 13, 17) COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL

SECURITY,

15 Defendant. 16 Plaintiff Marco Rashid seeks judicial review of a final decision by Defendant Commissioner of Social Security denying an application for supplemental security income.1 In the summary judgment motion, Plaintiff contends the final decision of the Commissioner contains legal error and is not supported by substantial evidence. Plaintiff seeks a remand for further proceedings. The Commissioner opposes Plaintiff’s motion, filed a cross-motion for summary judgment, and seeks affirmance. For the reasons below, Plaintiff’s motion is DENIED, the Commissioner’s cross- motion is GRANTED, and the final decision of the Commissioner decision is AFFIRMED. / / / / / / 27 1 This action was referred to the magistrate judge under Local Rule 302(c)(15) and proceeds on the consent of all…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.