(SS) Rashid v. Commissioner of Social Security
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MARCO RASHID, Case No. 2:23-cv-1826-CSK Plaintiff, ORDER ON PARTIES’ CROSS MOTIONS
FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
v. (ECF Nos. 13, 17) COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL
SECURITY,
15 Defendant. 16 Plaintiff Marco Rashid seeks judicial review of a final decision by Defendant Commissioner of Social Security denying an application for supplemental security income.1 In the summary judgment motion, Plaintiff contends the final decision of the Commissioner contains legal error and is not supported by substantial evidence. Plaintiff seeks a remand for further proceedings. The Commissioner opposes Plaintiff’s motion, filed a cross-motion for summary judgment, and seeks affirmance. For the reasons below, Plaintiff’s motion is DENIED, the Commissioner’s cross- motion is GRANTED, and the final decision of the Commissioner decision is AFFIRMED. / / / / / / 27 1 This action was referred to the magistrate judge under Local Rule 302(c)(15) and proceeds on the consent of all…