Sentry Select Insurance Company v. Norcold, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 26, 20241:21-cv-00521California193 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SENTRY SELECT INSURANCE Case No. 1:21-cv-00521-JLT-SAB COMPANY,

ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO

Plaintiff, CLOSE CASE AND ADJUST THE DOCKET

TO REFLECT VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL

Vv PURSUANT TO RULE 41(a) OF THE FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE NORCOLD, INC., et al., (ECF No. 44) Defendants. 16 On September 24, 2024, a stipulation was filed dismissing this action with prejudice and 18 || each party bearing its own attorneys’ fees and costs. (ECF No. 44.) In light of the stipulation of 19 || the parties, this action has been terminated, Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)Gi); Wilson v. City of San 20 || Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997), and has been dismissed with prejudice. Accordingly, the Clerk of the Court is HEREBY ORDERED to CLOSE the file in this 22 case and adjust the docket to reflect voluntary dismissal of this action pursuant to Rule 41(a).

IT IS SO…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.