Puckett
Puckett v. County of Sacramento
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JEREMY PHILLIP PUCKETT, No. 2:22-cv-0350-KJM-CKD Plaintiffs, v. ORDER COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, et al., Defendants. 16 Before the court are plaintiff’s motion to compel (ECF Nos. 206 & 212 (Joint Statement)) and defendants’ motion for protective order (ECF Nos. 207 & 211 (Joint Statement)). Plaintiff served his first discovery requests in December 2022, and the parties have been in constant discovery litigation for almost two years. On September 25, 2024, the undersigned held a hearing via Zoom on both motions. Alison Draikiwicz, Harrison Frahn, Ziwei Xiao, and Karyn Sinunu-Towney appeared on behalf of plaintiff. John Whitefleet appeared on behalf of defendants. At the conclusion of the hearing, the court granted plaintiff’s motion to compel (ECF No. 206), as set forth in more detail below, and took the motion for protective order (ECF No. 207) under submission. This order follows. //// //// //// I. …