(SS) Maravillas v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 27, 20242:23-cv-00782California3,364 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DANIEL A. MARAVILLAS, No. 2:23-cv-00782-CKD Plaintiff, v. ORDER COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL

SECURITY,

15 Defendant.

17 Plaintiff seeks judicial review of a final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security (“Commissioner”) denying applications for Disability Income Benefits (“DIB”) and Supplemental Security Income (“SSI”) under Titles II and XVI of the Social Security Act (“Act”), respectively. The parties have consented to magistrate judge jurisdiction. For the reasons discussed below, the court will grant plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment and deny the Commissioner’s cross-motion for summary judgment. BACKGROUND Plaintiff, born in 1990, applied on March 13, 2020 for DIB and SSI, alleging disability beginning January 15, 2020. Administrative Transcript (“AT”) 23, 31. Plaintiff alleged he was unable to work due to Tourette’s Syndrome, PTSD, personality disorder, schizophrenia, and ADHD. AT 75. In a decision dated…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.