(PC)Wilson

(PC)Wilson v. Mule Creek State Prison

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 25, 20242:24-cv-02354California3,922 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CHRISTOPHER JOHN WILSON, No. 2:24-cv-2354 CSK P Plaintiff, v. ORDER MULE CREEK STATE PRISON, et al., Defendants. 16 I.INTRODUCTION Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se. Plaintiff seeks relief pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §1983 and requested leave to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. This proceeding was referred to this Court by Local Rule 302 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Plaintiff submitted a declaration that makes the showing required by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). Accordingly, the request to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. Plaintiff is required to pay the statutory filing fee of $350.00 for this action. 28 U.S.C. §§1914(a), 1915(b)(1). By this order, plaintiff is assessed an initial partial filing fee in accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1). By separate order, the Court will direct the appropriate agency to collect the initial partial filing fee from…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.