Dominisse

(PC) Coleman v. Dominisse

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 27, 20242:24-cv-00583California1,505 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ANDREW JAMES COLEMAN, No. 2:24-cv-00583-KJM-EFB (PC) Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

PAMELA JEAN DOMINISSE, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a county jail inmate currently facing criminal prosecution. He proceeds 17 without counsel in an action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 challenging the conduct of his 18 public defender and various other attorneys in the county public defender’s office. ECF No. 1. In 19 addition to filing a complaint, he also filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis. ECF No. 20 2. 21 Application to Proceed in Forma Pauperis 22 Plaintiff’s application does not make the showing required by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1) and 23 (2). Plaintiff indicates on the form that he receives money from outside sources but has left the 24 portion of the form seeking a description of that money blank. ECF No. 2 at 2. The certificate 25 portion is blank in the space indicated for the six-month average balance of plaintiff’s…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.