Olson

(PS) Josephson v. Olson

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 25, 20242:24-cv-00912California918 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KRISTOFFER ALLEN JOSEPHSON, No. 2:24-CV-0912-DAD-DMC Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS JOYCE OLSON, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, who is proceeding pro se, brings this civil action. Pending before the Court is Plaintiff's motion docketed as a motion for a temporary restraining order. See ECF No. 4. The legal principles applicable to requests for injunctive relief, such as a temporary restraining order or preliminary injunction, are well established. To prevail, the moving party must show that irreparable injury is likely in the absence of an injunction. See Stormans, Inc. v. Selecky, 586 F.3d 1109, 1127 (9th Cir. 2009) (citing Winter v. Natural Res. Def. Council, Inc., 129 S.Ct. 365 (2008)). When a mandatory injunction is sought – one that goes beyond simply maintaining the status quo during litigation – the moving party bears a "doubly demanding" burden and must establish that the law and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.