(PC)Tsetse

(PC)Tsetse v. Campbell

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 27, 20241:24-cv-00275California1,563 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 PRINCE FRANKLIN TSETSE, Case No.: 1:24-cv-00275-CDB Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL

v.

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

TAMMY CAMPBELL, TO EXPEDITE Defendant. (Doc. 10) 16 Plaintiff Prince Franklin Tsetse is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action proceeds against Defendant Tammy Campbell for violations of Plaintiff’s constitutional rights. I. BACKGROUND On March 6, 2024, Plaintiff filed his complaint and motion to proceed in forma pauperis. (Docs. 1, 2). On March 8, 2024, the Court granted Plaintiff’s motion. (Doc. 7.) On September 19, 2024, Plaintiff filed a document titled “Pleading Brief.” (Doc. 10.) In that document, Plaintiff requests the Court to “move forward” with the screening of Plaintiff’s complaint and to appoint counsel, and expresses his willingness to explore settlement and 26 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.