Seifert

Seifert v. Pritchard

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 27, 20241:24-cv-01097California594 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ALEXANDRA SEIFERT, Case No. 1:24-cv-01097-CDB Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S

MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA

v. PAUPERIS

KENNETH GEORGE PRITCHARD, et al., (Doc. 2)

Defendants. ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S

MOTION FOR ELECTRONIC FILING

16 (Doc. 3)

18 Plaintiff Alexandra Seifert (“Plaintiff”), proceeding pro se, filed this civil action on September 16, 2024. (Doc. 1). Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis Plaintiff has filed a motion to proceed in forma pauperis without prepaying fees or costs pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. (Doc. 2). The Court finds Plaintiff has made the showing required by § 1915, and the request to proceed in forma pauperis shall be granted. As to the status of the complaint, Plaintiff is advised that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2), the Court must conduct an initial review of pro se complaint where the plaintiff proceeds in forma pauperis to determine whether it is…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.