Phillips
(PC) Grzeslo v. Phillips
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 JAMES GRZESLO, No. 1:24-cv-00615-SAB (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO
RANDOMLY ASSIGN A DISTRICT JUDGE
v. TO THIS ACTION BRYAN D. PHILLIPS, et al., FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION
RECOMMENDING DISMISSAL OF ACTION
Defendants. FOR FAILURE TO STATE A COGNIZABLE
CLAIM FOR RELIEF
14 (ECF No. 19)
16 Plaintiff is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this action filed pursuant to 42
U.S.C. § 1983.
18 Currently before the Court is Plaintiff’s second amended complaint, filed September 10, 19 2024. 20 I.
SCREENING REQUIREMENT
22 The Court is required to screen complaints brought by prisoners seeking relief against a 23 governmental entity or officer or employee of a governmental entity. 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). The 24 Court must dismiss a complaint or portion thereof if the prisoner has raised claims that are legally 25 “frivolous or malicious,” that “fail[] to state a claim on which relief may be granted,” or…