Hixon

(PC) Tellez v. Hixon

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 30, 20241:24-cv-00402California461 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RUDY TELLEZ, No. 1:24-cv-00402 GSA (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

v.

ORDER RECOMMENDING MATTER BE

K. HIXON, et al., DISMISSED FOR FAILURE TO FILE

NOTICE OF CURRENT ADDRESS WITH

Defendants. COURT PLAINTIFF’S OBJECTIONS DUE IN

FOURTEEN DAYS

18 Plaintiff, who may now be a former state prisoner1, is proceeding pro se and in forma 19 pauperis and has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter 20 was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local 21 Rule 302. 22 On July 23, 2024, an order issued by the Court and served on Plaintiff was returned to it 23 marked “Undeliverable, Return to Sender, Attempted – Not Known, Unable to Forward,

25 26 The Court takes judicial notice of the fact that a search for Plaintiff’s name and inmate number on the California Department of Corrections and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.