Starr

(PC) Millare v. Starr

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 27, 20242:20-cv-02072California7,077 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MORIANO MILLARE, No. 2:20-cv-2072 DAD AC P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS &

RECOMMENDATIONS

STARR, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Currently before the court is defendants’ motion for summary judgment. ECF No. 38. I. Procedural History This case proceeds on plaintiff’s first amended complaint (FAC) (ECF No. 15), which was screened and found to state a claim for relief against defendant Starr (ECF No. 16). Plaintiff’s claims against defendants L. Fernando, K. Kesterson, KJ Allen, J. Flores, KD Johnson, L. Bird, E. Casillas, L. Fernando, and A. Ortega Shafer were dismissed by the court. Id. Following the close of discovery, defendant filed a motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 38), which is now fully briefed. //// //// II. Plaintiff’s Allegations The FAC names eleven defendants, all of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.