(HC) Shrader v. Garland

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 30, 20241:21-cv-01229California378 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 THOMAS C. SHRADER, ) Case No.: 1:21-cv-01229-DJC-CDB (HC) ) Petitioner, ) ) v. ) ) ORDER MERRICK B. GARLAND, et al., ) ) Respondent. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On May 22, 2023, the Magistrate Judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on all parties, and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. The Petitioner has filed objections to the findings and recommendations. The Court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.