Moore
Murphy v. Moore
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DEAN MURPHY, Case No. 1:24-cv-00226-JLT-SKO
Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
THAT DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO
DISMISS AND MOTION TO STRIKE BE v.
GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN
PART DEWAYNE MOORE, individually, and as Code Enforcement Inspector for the City of FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Fresno; CITY OF FRESNO, a City or THAT PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO FILE Municipality; and DOES 1-10, Inclusive, AN UNTIMELY FILING BE GRANTED
Defendants. (Doc. 11, 17, 18)
OBJECTIONS DUE: 21 DAYS 19 20 I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Dean Murphy, proceeding pro se, initiated this action against Dewayne Moore and the City of Fresno (the “City”) (collectively, “Defendants”) by filing a complaint on February 21, 2024. (Doc. 1). Defendants filed a motion to dismiss (Doc. 5) on May 13, 2025. Plaintiff filed a First Amended Complaint…