Sheikh

Sheikh v. Spinnaker Ins. Co.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 30, 20242:23-cv-01582California3,287 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 FIRDOS SHEIKH, an individual, No. 2:23-cv-01582-TLN-SCR

12 Plaintiff, ORDER v.

SPINNAKER INSURANCE COMPANY,

15 et al.,

16 Defendants.

19 This matter is before the Court on Defendants Spinnaker Insurance Company and Hippo Analytics Inc.’s (“Defendants”) Motion to Dismiss. (ECF No. 9.) Plaintiff Firdos Sheikh (“Plaintiff”) filed an opposition. (ECF No. 13.) Defendants filed a reply. (ECF No. 15.) For the reasons set forth below, the Court DENIES Defendants’ motion. /// /// /// /// /// I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND This case arises from an insurance coverage dispute. Plaintiff owns a property at 9005 Calvine Road, Sacramento, California (the “Property”). (ECF No. 1 at 2.) Defendants are home insurance providers. (Id. at 3.) On June 23, 2020, Defendants issued Plaintiff a landlord home insurance policy for the Property, covering the period of June 23, 2020, to June 23, 2021 (the “Policy”). (Id. at 3.) The Policy…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.