(PC) Winston v. United States

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 30, 20241:24-cv-00934California2,159 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 LEANTHONY T. WINSTON, Case No. 1:24-cv-00934-KES-HBK (PC) Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO

DENY PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR LEAVE

v. TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS UNDER 28 U.S.C. § 1915 (g) 1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

FOURTEEN-DAY OBJECTION PERIOD

Defendant. (Doc. No. 6) 16 Plaintiff LeAnthony T. Winston, a prisoner incarcerated at USP-Atwater, initiated this action by filing a pro se prisoner complaint pursuant to the Federal Tort Claims Act (“FTCA”) on August 12, 2024. (Doc. No. 1, “Complaint”). On August 13, 2024, the Court directed Plaintiff to either file an application to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”) or pay the $405.00 filing fee for civil actions within 30 days. (Doc. No. 3). On September 16, 2024, Plaintiff filed an IFP application. (Doc. No. 8). For the reasons discussed below, the undersigned recommends the district court deny Plaintiff’s IFP motion under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) because Plaintiff has had…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.