A.S.

A.S. v. Point Quest

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 30, 20242:23-cv-02029California7,469 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 A. S., No. 2:23-cv-02029-TLN-CSK Plaintiff, v. ORDER POINT QUEST, et al., Defendants. 16 This matter is before the Court on Defendants Vacaville Unified School District (“VUSD”) and Anastasia Boomer’s (“Boomer”) (collectively, “District Defendants”) Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 17) and Motion to Strike (ECF No. 18). Also before the Court are Defendants Point Quest and Hannah Smith’s (“Smith”) (collectively, “Point Quest Defendants”) Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 19) and Motion to Strike (ECF No. 20). All motions are fully briefed. (ECF Nos. 25–28, 32–35.) For the reasons set forth below, the Court: (1) GRANTS in part and DENIES in part District Defendants’ motion to dismiss; (2) DENIES Point Quest Defendants’ motion to dismiss; (3) GRANTS in part and DENIES in part District Defendants’ motion to strike; and (4) DENIES Point Quest Defendants’ motion to strike. /// /// /// I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.