(PS) Wilkinson v. PHH Mortgage Corp.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 30, 20242:24-cv-01416California1,961 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KENNETH G. WILKINSON; and KELLY No. 2:24-cv-01416-TLN-AC

G. WILKINSON

12 Plaintiffs, ORDER v. 14 PHH MORTGAGE CORPORATION; and WESTERN PROGRESSIVE LLC, Defendants. 17 This matter is before the Court on Plaintiffs Kenneth G. Wilkinson and Kelly G. Wilkinson’s (“Plaintiffs”) Ex Parte Application for a Temporary Restraining Order (“TRO”). (ECF No. 18.) No opposition has been filed by Defendants PHH Mortgage Corporation (“PHH”) and Western Progressive LLC (collectively, “Defendants”). For the reasons set forth below, Plaintiff’s application is DENIED. /// /// /// /// /// /// I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND As an initial matter, Plaintiffs proceed in this action without counsel. As a result, the Court experienced some difficulty in determining the factual allegations underlying Plaintiff’s claims. However, Plaintiffs’ application for a TRO, when read in conjunction with documents in the Court’s record, suggest the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.