Lacy

Lacy v. Turner

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 30, 20241:23-cv-01763California417 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JANICE LACY, No. 1:23-cv-01763-KES-EPG Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS TO DISMISS THIS

v. CASE WITHOUT PREJUDICE AND TO

DENY PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR A

TURNER, TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER Defendant. Docs. 3, 9. 16 Plaintiff Janice Lacy proceeds pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil action. The matter was referred to a United States magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On April 22, 2024, the assigned magistrate judge entered findings and recommendations, recommending that this case be dismissed, without prejudice, (1) under the Younger abstention and Rooker-Feldman doctrines; (2) for failure to comply with a court order and failure to prosecute; and (3) for failure to provide a current address. Doc. 9. The magistrate judge further recommended that plaintiff’s motion for a temporary restraining order (Doc. 3) be…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.