Hamim

(PS) Wenzler v. Hamim

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 1, 20242:24-cv-02074California858 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ELIZABETH ROSE WENZLER, Case No. 2:24-cv-02074-DAD-JDP (PS) Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS v. THAT THE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT

BE DISMISSED WITHOUT LEAVE TO

MALIK HAMIM, et al., AMEND Defendants. ECF No. 15 OBJECTIONS DUE WITHIN FOURTEEN

DAYS

17 Plaintiff brings this action alleging various wrongs stemming from a car accident in October 2020. I screened her previous complaint, found that it failed to establish a basis for federal jurisdiction, and granted her leave to amend. ECF No. 9. Plaintiff filed an amended complaint on August 30, 2024, and, as before, it establishes no basis for federal jurisdiction. Accordingly, I now recommend that this action be dismissed. Screening and Pleading Requirements A federal court must screen the complaint of any claimant seeking permission to proceed in forma pauperis. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e). …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.