(PS) Murphy v. AFSCME Union Local 257

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 1, 20242:23-cv-01627California603 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9

SHANNON O. MURPHY, Sr., No. 2:23-cv-01627-TLN-JDP

Plaintiff,

v. ORDER

AFSCME UNION LOCAL 257,

Defendants.

17 This matter is before the Court on pro se Plaintiff Shannon O. Murphy, Sr.’s (“Plaintiff”) 18 Motion for Reconsideration. (ECF No. 6.) Defendant AFSCME Union Local 257 (“Defendant”) 19 did not file an opposition. For the reasons set forth below, the Court DENIES Plaintiff’s motion. 20 /// 21 /// 22 /// 23 /// 24 /// 25 /// 26 /// 27 /// 28 A detailed recitation of the factual and procedural history is not necessary for the disposition of Plaintiff’s motion. In short, Plaintiff filed a Complaint against Defendant, alleging negligence, breach of contract, discrimination, harassment, and assault. (ECF Nos. 1, 3.) On January 24, 2024, the magistrate judge made findings and recommended the Complaint be dismissed without leave to amend for failure to state a legally cognizable claim (“F&Rs”). (ECF No.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.