(PC) Flow-Sunkett v. T. Redmon

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 30, 20241:21-cv-01137California5,441 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 GLENN S. SUNKETT, Case No. 1:21-cv-01137-HBK (PC)

Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’

REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE

v. (Doc. No. 55-2) T. BOERUM and T. REDMON,

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION

Defendants.

TO DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE1

(Doc. No. 55)

16 Pending before the Court is Defendants T. Boerum and T. Redmon’s Motion to Dismiss filed on June 18, 2024. (Doc. No. 55, “Motion”). Included within Defendant’s Motion is a Request for Judicial Notice. (Doc. No. 55-2). Plaintiff timely filed an Opposition (Doc. No. 56), and Defendants filed a Reply (Doc. No. 57). For reasons set forth below, the Court grants both the Request for Judicial Notice and the Motion to Dismiss. BACKGROUND Plaintiff, a prisoner, initiated this action by filing a civil rights complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. (Doc. No. 1). Plaintiff is proceeding on his Third Amended Complaint (“TAC”), as screened, which alleges Fourteenth…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.