Becerra

(HC) Cabrera Espinoza v. Becerra

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 1, 20241:24-cv-01118California281 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ADRIAN CABRERA ESPINOZA, Case No. 1:24-cv-01118-SAB-HC

Petitioner, ORDER GRANTING PETITIONER’S

UNOPPOSED MOTION TO AMEND

v. PETITION TO NAME A PROPER

RESPONDENT

MOISES BECERRA, et al., (ECF No. 58) Respondents.

16 Petitioner is a federal immigration detainee proceeding with a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. On September 27, 2024, Petitioner filed an unopposed motion to amend the petition to name Golden State Annex Facility Administrator Minga Wofford as a Respondent in this matter. “[L]ongstanding practice confirms that in habeas challenges to present physical confinement— ‘core challenges’—the default rule is that the proper respondent is the warden of the facility where the prisoner is being held . . . .” Rumsfeld v. Padilla, 542 U.S. 426, 435 (2004). In the immigration detention context, the Ninth Circuit has held that “[u]nder Padilla, [Petitioner] must name his immediate custodian, [here] the Facility Administrator of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.