Howard
(PC) Walker v. Howard
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 1, 20241:22-cv-00332California4,320 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MARQUISE WALKER, Case No.: 1:22-cv-00332-JLT-CDB Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
TO DISMISS THIS ACTION WITHOUT
v. PREJUDICE FOR PLAINTIFF’S FAILURE
TO PROSECUTE; ALTERNATIVELY, TO
HOWARD, et al., GRANT IN PART AND DENY IN PART
DEFENDANT’S PARTIAL MOTION TO
Defendant. DISMISS
(Doc. 23)
14-DAY OBJECTION DEADLINE
Plaintiff Marquise Walker is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. I. INTRODUCTION On July 15, 2024, Defendant Howard filed a partial motion to dismiss Plaintiff’s complaint. (Doc. 23.) Specifically, the motion seeks to dismiss Plaintiff’s First Amendment retaliation claim pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (Id. at 5-10.) Defendant’s motion included the following notice: “Written opposition to this motion…