BASF Corporation v. Elite Collision Center, Inc.
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 1, 20241:24-cv-00835California705 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
BASF CORPORATION, Case No. 1:24-cv-00835-CDB
Plaintiff,
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY
SANCTIONS SHOULD NOT BE IMPOSED
v.
FOR PLAINTIFF’S FAILURE TO
PROSECUTE THIS ACTION AND TO
ELITE COLLISION CENTER, INC., et al.,
COMPLY WITH THE COURT’S ORDERS
Defendants.
ORDER CONTINUING THE
MANDATORY SCHEDULING
CONFERENCE
ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO
EFFECT SERVICE OF THIS ORDER AND
TO FILE PROOF OF SERVICE
FIVE-DAY DEADLINE
20 21 Background Plaintiff BASF Corporation (“Plaintiff”) initiated this action with the filing of a complaint on July 19, 2024. (Doc. 1). That same day, the Clerk of the Court issued summonses and the Court entered an order setting a mandatory scheduling conference on October 8, 2024. (Docs. 3-4). The Court’s order directed Plaintiff to “diligently pursue service of summons and complaint” and “promptly file proofs of service.” (Doc. 4 at 1). The order further advised Plaintiff that failure to diligently prosecute this action “may result in the…