Berexa

Berexa v. Target Corp.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 2, 20242:24-cv-01154California2,694 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 LINDA BEREXA, No. 2:24-cv-01154-JAM-DMC Plaintiff, v. ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S

MOTION TO DISMISS

TARGET CORPORATION, and DOES 1 to 25, 16 Defendants. 17 Before the Court is Target Corporation’s (hereinafter, “Defendant”) motion to dismiss four of the five causes of action in Linda Berexa’s (hereinafter, “Plaintiff”) First Amended Complaint (“FAC”). See Mot., ECF No. 16; FAC, ECF No. 15. Plaintiff opposed. See Opp’n, ECF No. 18. Defendant replied. See Reply, ECF No. 19. For the following reasons, Defendant’s motion is granted with prejudice.1 ///

1This motion was determined to be suitable for decision without oral argument. E.D. Cal. L.R. 230(g). The hearing was scheduled for September 24, 2024. I. FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND Plaintiff originally filed suit in the Superior Court of California, County of Butte. See Notice of Removal, ECF No. 1. Defendant then timely removed the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.